Where to Renew Medical Marijuana Card? Prescott Valley
| Voting on Marijuana | |||
|---|---|---|---|
 | |||
| Balloting Measures | |||
| By say | |||
| By year | |||
| Not happening ballot | |||
|
The Arizona Medical examination Marijuana Initiative, also notable as Proposition 203, or I-04-2010, was on the November 2, 2010 balloting in the posit of Genus Arizona as an initiated state statute. It was approved.
The measure was sponsored by the AZ Medical Marijuana Policy Project.[1]
The proposition allowed residents in the state with specific Greco-Roman deity conditions to make up treated with in for amounts of marijuana for personal use. According to the provisions of the initiative, the Arizona Department of Health Services would be put in charge of regulating the cut-rate sale and economic consumption of medical marijuana. The measure allowed qualified patients and caregivers to purchase the drug from specific, closely watched clinics.[2] [3]
Patients would be protected from arrest and prosecution for using the plant for medicinal purposes. Employers would also non be allowed to discriminate in hiring employees, as well atomic number 3 terminating employment against registered cardholders. However, the measure did not allow workers to make up along the medicine while on the job.[4] [5] Arizona became the 15th DoS to legalize the use of medical ganja with the transition of the amendment.[2] [3]
Election results
-
- See also: 2010 voting measuring stick election results
Official election results of the cadence were:
| Proposition 203 (Medical Marijuana) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
 a Yes | 841,348 | 50.1% | ||
| No | 837,008 | 49.9% | ||
Results via the Semiofficial Election Canvass of Results from the Arizona Secretary of State's website.
Aftermath
Strict rules were proposed for the approved measure, relating to potential users of medical marijuana in the tell. According to a Washington Post report, estimates stated that only 20,000 patients would be eligible to enjoyment medical cannabis, under the previously mentioned stricter rules. Leave Humble, director of the Arizona Department of Health Services stated, "We figured hey, if we put some true checks and balances in this system, we can actually lay down this a medical marijuana program and not a recreational marijuana program."[6]
Proposed tax
Arizona Attorney General Tomcat Lena Calhoun Horne was one of the opponents of the passage of the quantify; nonetheless, Horne called for medical Cannabis sativa to be taxed. According to reports, province tax collectors planned to taxation medical marijuana since it was non a prescribed medicine. State law exempts prescription drugs from being taxed, merely marijuana would be sold to patients with "certification" from doctors, non with a ethical drug. Accordant to Anthony Forschino, spokesman for the country Department of Revenue: "It's not a prescription medicine. IT's a written enfranchisement. IT would equitable be a retail sales event, like purchasing something polish off the shelf or terminated the counter." Horne stated that the tax could bring in about $40 million a year to the express.[7]
- See also: Previous attempts to assess medical checkup marihuana in Grand Canyon State
Governing rules
On Mar 28, 2011, the Arizona Department of Health Services free rules on who could grow, distribute and consume the marijuana plant for medical apply. The specifics of the rules government activity the procedures surrounding medical cannabis were as follows:
- Effective date that the rules are to be put into outcome was April 14, 2011.
- In order to receive a patient registry identification card, the department listed Greco-Roman deity conditions the forbearing must have. In addition, a physician had to name the patient thereupon specific condition. This list enclosed, in the first of the five conditions listed, cancer, glaucoma, HIV, AIDS and hepatitis C. In all, on that point were 14 health chec conditions listed.
- To renew an identification tease, buyers had to submit a request and otherwise information to the health department 30 calendar days before the going of the current identification card.
- Dispensaries could begin applying for certificates on June 1, 2011, and the department would take up those applications for 30 days after that date.
- Smoky medical cannabis by a patient in public places was prohibited.
- An employer could non single out against a qualifying medical ganja uncomplaining.
To understand more of these rules, visit this text file provided by the Arizona Department of Health Services.
Cause
Governor Jan Brewer announced that the state would file a lawsuit in Fed court by May 27, 2011 in order to elucidate that the medical marijuana jurisprudence was indeed legal. According to reports, the cause was in reception to U.S. Attorney for Grand Canyon State Dennis Burke, WHO claimed in a letter to Department of State health officials that the cultivation, sales agreement and dispersion of marijuana was against federal legal philosophy.
According just right, Burke stated that he would "vigorously prosecute individuals and organizations that participate in unlawful manufacturing, distribution and selling activity involving marihuana, even if such activities are permitted under State Department law."
Brewer said in a program line regarding the causa that would make up filed: "I won't outdoor stage digression while state employees and average Arizonans temporary in good faith are unwittingly put at risk. In light of the unambiguous warnings on this issue offered by Genus Arizona's U.S. Lawyer, arsenic well as many other federal prosecutors, clearness and judicial direction are in tell."
Lawsuit dropped
Brewer dropped her lawsuit during the early part of January 2012 and stated that she would allow United States Department of State health officials to part the process for licensing dispensaries. However, because of a pending causa in which potential dispensary proprietor, Gerald Gaines, sued due to allegations that the governor unsuccessful to fully implement the law, Brewer explicit she would not allow workers to issue licenses until the legal challenge was settled.[8]
Bill excluding college students
A bill was passed during 2012 state civil law seance that would deny medical cannabis to college students in the state. The marriage offer, Business firm Bill 2349, was designed to make it illegal to use and possess marijuana on the campus of any public or private college. The lawmaking was planned by state Rep. Amanda Reeve who stated, "They're not exit to comprise able to habituate or possess marijuana along campus. That's how we shell out with the issue so we can stop in compliance with federal laws." Joe Yuhas, spokesman for the Arizona Medical Marijuana Association, responded, "This is an attack connected patients ... who are abiding by state law."[9]
On Crataegus oxycantha 23, 2018, the Arizona Supreme Court, in a unanimous legal opinion, struck down the police force as unconstitutional.[10]
Text of measure
Ballot title
The vote title that Arizona voters saw read as follows:[11]
| " | A "yes" vote shall have the effect of authorizing the use of marijuana for people with debilitating medical conditions WHO hold a written certification from a medic and establishing a regulative system governed aside the Arizona Department of Health Services for establishing and licensing medical Cannabis sativa dispensaries. A "nary" vote shall have the effect of retaining current law regarding the enjoyment of marijuana.[12] | " |
Short title
The brusque title of the measure, according to the Arizona Secretary of State's web site, read American Samoa follows:[13]
| " | The Arizona Medical Marijuana Act protects terminally or in earnest ill patients from state prosecution for using modified amounts of marijuana on their doctor's testimonial. Qualifying patients who register with the Arizona Department of Health Services testament incur marijuana from nonprofit health chec cannabis dispensaries regulated by ADHS. Head-to-head cultivation will be allowed by ADHS only when no dispensary is available. The Turn is self-funding and establishes safeguards: registration cards; fingerprinting of caregivers and dispensary personnel to exclude drug and violent felons; strict security, recordkeeping and oversight requirements; inspection of dispensaries; restrictions on number and position of dispensaries; and providing penalties.[12] | " |
Compact of initiative
The compact of the initiative, As provided by the Arizona Secretary of State's website, was:
| " |
| " |
Federal memorandum
On October 19, 2009 Deputy U.S. Attorney General of the United States David Ogden issued a memorandum to government prosecutors in states that allowed for the use of Graeco-Roman deity marihuana. The memo said that government resources should not be focused on "individuals whose actions are in clear and unequivocal compliance with existing state of matter laws providing for the medical use of marijuana."[15]
In ignitor of the recent news, Myers aforesaid, "This is the almost important event that has happened in the medical-cannabis movement in the last 30 years." To boot, Myers noted that the authorities memo wish help relieve concerns for participants and dispensary operators.[16]
Sustain
Supporters
- The Arizona Medical examination Marijuana Insurance policy Project filed the prayer with the Foreign minister's Office on November 23, 2009, which listed Diane Manchester as the official president of the organisation. Manchester was a former civilian employee of the Phoenix Police force Department who emeritus along disability. She turned to medical marijuana in rules of order to help her deal with painful sensation that resulted from her MS. She took her place as chairman due to the growing fear, at the time, among checkup marijuana patients that they power embody inactive. According to Manchester: "I am and so prone to being scared, and it's terrible. I want to stop the fear of the people World Health Organization need it (marijuana). I am so tired of not being able-bodied to tell the true statement. I know when my nominate and picture are retired there people are going to know me. And that's okay."[17]
- Heather Torgerson, chair of the Arizona Learned profession Marijuana Policy Externalize, stated that she wrote a college paper against the use of medical ganja. She altered her position because she declared the reason for her survival of head cancer was the use of the do drugs. She stated that chemotherapy and radiation caused her to experience nausea and fatigue, but when she used marijuana, her appetite returned quickly. Torgerson commented about the drug, "I owe my life to information technology."[18]
- The Pima County Democratic Party advisable a 'yes' vote on the measure.[19]
Arguments
- According to supporters, other steps were taken to ensure that the dispersion of medical cannabis would be distributed in a strictly regulated way.
- Supporters further declared that people who were diagnosed with cancer, AIDs, HIV, Alzheimer's, Hepatitis C and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis would gain from the measure.
- According to Andrew Myers, of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Insurance policy Project, "There are doctors finished Arizona already that are recommending marijuana to their patients, but they're doing it in an extra-collection style. And we're putting patients who are doing nonentity but following a doctor's advice at risk for felony prosecution."[20]
- Myers went on to argue, "This takes a musical composition of the market away from the drug cartels and gives patients a safe, court-ordered alternative. In that respect is abuse in some scheme when you are talking well-nig possessed substances. The good intelligence with marihuana is that you can't overdose on that. It's not physiologically addictive like painkillers."[5]
Noteworthy events
- Supporters of the initiative tapering to an secondary in Michigan where a prole was fired past Wal-Mart Inc. under its anti-drug policy. The worker had been lawfully prescribed marijuana to help process pain from sinus cancer, only was not excused from the policy. The firing shed light on the initiative, which supporters said would stop incidents like the one in Michigan due to the provisions in the proposed step that would prevent workers from being fired if under Graeco-Roman deity Cannabis sativa treatment.[21]
- Joseph Casias, of Battle Creek, Michigan, was fired in November 2009 after he was drug tried in a usual covering when helium sprained his knee on the job.[22]
- According to a Yuma Sun editorial, which commented on the situation in Michigan and the initiative in Arizona, "Even if the marijuana is for medical purposes, it could spoil the proletarian. Employers need to take over some way to deal with this potential problem so they can maintain safe workplaces if the use of Graeco-Roman deity marijuana is allowed."[23]
- A report was acknowledged by KVOA in Tucson, highlighting a man World Health Organization was subordinate connected the hemp plant to alleviate his pain. Tom Maza utilized the drug for 30 years and stated that he was hoping for the enactment of Proposition 203. According to Maza, "It would change my life dramatically with just the medical aspect of it being legalized, because as a person who is diagnosed with Human immunodeficiency virus in 1985 back when there wasn't a single pill for that, it was something at that time that just kept me going. ... Marijuana has by its ability to pioneer vascular blood vessels, it makes IT go in essence and keeps it away."[24]
- The Pima County Board of Supervisors began their preparations for the passage of the amendment. Although the theme stated this did not crystallise which slope the control panel was taking with this issue, it did state that the board gave approval to initiate the initiation of a zoning code for aesculapian marijuana facilities and dispensaries. The board voted 5-0 to get this operation. Accordant to supervisor Sharon Bronson, "Should this opening pass we'll at any rate Be Sir Thomas More prepared than those in California and Centennial State."[25]
- There were claims in the state that medical marijuana, if the measure passed, would be oversubscribed along Mobile River "cannabis caravans." Notwithstandin, supporters of the measure stated that the law would make up carefully monitored—more so than analogous measures that were passed in other states. Reported to Saint Andrew Myers, of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Policy Project, "IT is a very detailed and well-regulated piece of statute law. Prop up. 203 is entirely unique. We Doctor of Osteopathy an first-class job of limiting the medical examination marijuana, and restricting who can sell it."[5]
Legislative fulfill
The AZ Legislature had formed to debate whether to tax the possible sale of marijuana. As the marriage proposal was approved aside voters in the November 2010 election, Sen. Jorge Luis Garcia wanted to tax the Cannabis sativa that would be after sold under the act. According to reports, an analysis by the legislative budget staff, which was non-partisan, stated that a medical marijuana tax had the potential to shovel in approximately $1 million for the put forward's general fund in 2012. The Arizona State Senat approved of the tax on Marchland 26, 2010 with a vote of 17-12. However, no further action was taken.[26] [27] [28] [29]
Campaigns, events and strategies
- On April 20, 2010, health chec marijuana activists marched through Safford, Genus Arizona, protesting in favor of the aesculapian marijuana measure. One activist, Jerry Benson, told a local paper that helium wouldn't be alive if it weren't for the cannabis plant. According to Benson, he was prescribed drugs that did damage to his liver and deteriorated his health, at which point doctors gave him only 90 days to live. Benson stated he stopped up using the prescribed drugs and started to smoke ganja, which lead to him living a longer and healthier life. Charles Gilbert, activist and user, stated during the march that marijuana was more effective in alleviating his pain than other prescribed drugs.[30]
- At a debate hosted by Cyclooxygenase Communications and Gateway Community College on September 22, 2010, all ten measures on the November ballot in Arizona were argued for and against aside both sides of the issues. Proposition 203 was discussed, to where Andrew Myers, of the Genus Arizona Medical Marijuana Policy Figure, argued about the mensuration, "Proposition 203 will allow patients unhazardous, legal and reliable access to medicine that for umteen can atomic number 4 life-saving."[31]
Opposition
Opponents
- The main opposition to the meter was Keep AZ Drug Free. According to Carolyn Momentary, chairman of the group, the quantity wasn't just most medical marijuana, merely about the protective covering of marijuana users. Reported to Short and sweet, "Saying that this is for medication for sick people is an absolute smokescreen." Short also pyramidical out that the law allowed for 2.5 ounces, which was more than what one person could sess in fortnight. Light expressed, "What happens to the excess? I think we have intercourse what happens to the excess."[32]
- Brewer opposing legalizing medical marijuana. She argued, "Almost all marijuana recommendations come from a a couple of doctors (World Health Organization) for, say, $150, volition prescribe pot to nearly anyone." She also claimed that although populate would benefit from the medicine, that "compassion bequeath quickly turn to to capitalism."[33]
- Max Fose, a Phoenix political adviser, created a campaign against the estimate of a medical marijuana task called "Stop the Sight." The crusade donated $2,500 towards defeated the proposed ballot initiative.[34]
- The Journeying Healthful Centers, a drug rehabilitation organization, stated its opposition to the measure.[35]
- Dough Hebert announced plans to launch a press against Proposition 203. According to Hebert, "It's really not around health chec Cannabis sativa it's just about decriminalization, and moorage the hands of the police, the prosecutors, and the courts. ... We'rhenium going to get really be overrun with interior groves around the state of Arizona, because most of Arizona is rural area."[29]
- Carolyn Short, president of the Keep AZ Dose Free anti-203 campaign, the measure was not what supporters were making it unstylish to be. Short expressed, "This is non about medical specialty. It is a backdoor route to legalization. This gives marihuana users unprecedented protections...It is a tragedy for employers, which is why the [[Arizona Chamber of Commerce]] is supporting our efforts"[5]
- Tim Carter, Yavapai County School Superintendent, claimed in an trained worker, "In my opinion, Shor 203 will negatively impact the health and safe of our students, our schools, and our communities. Children and young adults will be allowed to experience "medical" cannabis cards and schools may not refuse to enter them! Prop 203 specifically allows children (with paternal license) to get ganja cards. Children who are ganja cardholders will be allowed to smoke before, during lunch breaks off campus and after school. (500 feet aside from the school)."[36]
- Linda Turley-Hansen, syndicated columnist and former Phoenix TV cast anchor, advised a 'nary' ballot on the step in an column revealing her recommendations for all the propositions on the Nov 2010 voting.[37]
- State Senator Ron Gould and State Representative Nancy G. McLain both sonant their opposition to the measure.[38]
- The Tucson Sleeping room of Commerce recommended a 'no' vote on the measure editorially.[39]
Arguments
Arguments that were made against the standard include:
- According to the Stop the Pot official website, the fight formed in order to inform Genus Arizona voters of the negative affects of legalizing medical examination marijuana. Too included on the site was the concern finished the credibility of the Medical Cannabis Insurance policy Project, which was the John R. Major financial support source of the circulating initiative.
- According to the website, when citing the negative affects, "Users will be able-bodied to smoke terminated 200 joints every 14 days. 200 joints a soul is a lot of drugs along our streets, in our neighborhoods and around our children."
- Another phrase found on the website declared, "Help keep drugs out of our neighborhoods and away from our children."Not only does the site refer to the amount of drugs being sold, only also the dispensaries that would sell those drugs...Do you want a pot frequent in your neighborhood?"[40] [41]
- The measure could result in lawsuits to solve the collection questions close the issue of medical marijuana, and its legalization. Drug Free America Executive Director Calvina Fay pointed out that legal issues arose in CA due to the legalization of Greco-Roman deity cannabis.[42]
- Carol Occident of the League of Women Voters, with an editorial published in Inside Tucson Commercial enterprise, stated that the measure should be passed. Westbound wrote, "Patc the proposition attempts to regulate drug use sol it is not exterior of control, it is difficult to effectively baffle marijuana because the dose can't be accurately sounded surgery regulated. There is also the potential for fraud and abuse...Other states that have legalized medical marijuana induce had a difficult sentence regulating its use. This is a clip for Arizonans to resist a trend and vote No on Suggestion 203."[43]
- Yavapai County Lawyer Sheila Polk stated in an editorial published by the Prescott News, "I birth through the research. As a parent and concerned citizen, I testament be voting "no" on Proposition 203. I advocate that each voter act their personal review and suspect that many wish come to the same conclusion. Consider these statistics from states who have adopted laws to "decriminalize marijuana for terminally ill patients": 97-98% of Graeco-Roman deity ganja cardholders are senior 17 to 35 and suffer from "degenerative pain" while only 2-3% of cardholders put u from cancer, glaucoma, HIV and other debilitating illnesses. Under proposition 203, a "cardholder" is entitled to 2.5 ounces of marijuana every two weeks amounting to 140 marijuana joints (10 joints per day). These bombastic amounts of unmonitored and unregulated marijuana are big, harvested and used-up in the community of interests."[44]
Campaigning and events
- According to reports, MATForce, which was the Yavapai County Substance Abuse coalition, offered an learning presentation on the measure, informing voters of the impacts that the proposal of marriage could have. The measure was dissected away Douglas Hebert. Hebert, a board penis of the Partnership for a Dose-Free America, was a former Phoenix DEA Assistant Special Federal agent.[45]
- At a debate hosted by Cox Communications and Gateway Community College happening September 22,2010, all ten measures on the November ballot in Arizona were argued for and against by some sides of the issues. Proposition 203 was discussed, to where Bill L. M. Montgomery, argued about the amount, "A toothache could nonplus you a recommendation for ganja, a bad back, lumbar pain, wearing high heels all daytime." The comment from Montgomery was a rebutter to Prop. 203 exponent Andrew Myers and his statements in favor of the measure.[31]
Campaign contributions
Support
Groups or individuals that donated to the campaign for the measure and the amount they donated are shown in the defer beneath:[46]
| Subscriber | Amount |
|---|---|
| Cox Communications | $64,500 |
| Marihuana Insurance Cast | $60,000 |
| Marijuana Policy Project | $50,000 |
| Campaign Communications, INC. | $16,244.95 |
| Marijuana Policy Picture | $15,000 |
| Marijuana Policy Project | $15,000 |
| Riester | $14,901 |
| Campaign Communications, Inc. | $13,024.32 |
| Reister | $12,000 |
| Contributor | Amount |
|---|---|
| J & R Graphics and Printing, LLC | $11,316.26 |
| Eusebius Sophronius Hieronymus Hirsch | $10,000 |
| TKM Trust | $10,000 |
| Lucid Holdings LLC | $10,000 |
| Transportation Recharge LLC | $10,000 |
| Patric Allan | $10,000 |
| Shane Howell | $10,000 |
| Ken Kulow | $10,000 |
| Heavy T and Little D | $10,000 |
Resistance
- The following is the measure contributed to the campaign against the measure.[47]
| Contributor | Amount |
|---|---|
| Arizona Cardinals | $10,000 |
| Wharton and Wadas | $5,847.05 |
| The Symington Grouping | $3,771.80 |
| Stop the Pile | $2,500 |
| Eric Wnuck | $2,400 |
| Eric Wnuck | $2,000 |
| Carolyn Short | $1,000 |
| Short, Carolyn | $700.00 |
| Contributor | Amount |
|---|---|
| Donationspages.com | $204.78 |
| Arizona Secretary of Department of State | $80.00 |
| 2CO.com | $75.00 |
| Justhost.com | $71.40 |
| Istock International | $58.40 |
| Patricia Wharton | $50.00 |
| PAYPAL | $39.00 |
| Matthew Wharton | $35.00 |
| Fed Ex Kinko's | $14.15 |
Analysis and reports
General assembly council depth psychology
A general assembly council analytic thinking was performed on the measure and published in the Arizona Secretary of State's Publicity Pamphlet. The analytic thinking was long and impartial, and can Be read here.[11]
Business legislative budget analysis
According to a required fiscal legislative assembly budget analytic thinking conducted regarding the measure, at the time, it was found that approximately 66,000 Arizona residents would comprise able to register subordinate the proposed medical marijuana political program. The depth psychology, performed by the Legislature's budget faculty, stated that 39,600 patients would register and that 26,400 approved caregivers would have the projected 66,000 patients by the 2012-2013 fiscal class, the year full implementation the proposal of marriage would require effect.[48]
The theme also stated that the hard costs of the measure would be covered by fees, civilised penalties and donations. According to reports, the analysis was based on the existent medical marijuana program in the commonwealth of Colorado.
Media endorsements
- See likewise: Endorsements of Arizona ballot measures, 2010
Support
- The Arizona Time unit Star hanging down Proposal 203, saying, "Would allow people with specific conditions, such as Crab, who have a doctor's prescription to legally buy out and use specific amounts of marijuana for medicinal purposes."[49]
- The Desert Lamp declared in an skilled worker about the measure: "This quantity allows sale of ganja to patients to atomic number 4 regulated aside the state, and patients would equal allowed to have controlled amounts of the essence without fear of being cited for possession. Even leaving aside the foolishness of the heavy regulations on marijuana and similar substances, this assess is just what we've been needing."[50]
- Goldwater State was for the measure, stating, "If happening the other hand you support inexpensive and relatively safe treatment of a act of conditions, if you believe that the ill should not be punished for seeking treatment and that marginal increase in recreational use is far outweighed by this, then vote "yes.""[51]
Opposition
- The Arizona Commonwealth was conflicting, saying, "This proffer is a dishonest attempt to nudge the State toward legalisation of marijuana. And IT saddles the DHS with start-up costs even though the section's common-fund budget has been cut by nearly 50 percent since fiscal 2008. More cuts are apt side by side year."[52]
- The East Valley Tribune recommended a 'no' vote on the quantity, stating, "Look at states like Colorado, Montana and California, where medical marijuana Torah are widely abused (essentially legalizing the drug) and law-breaking has risen sharply roughly centers that distribute the drug. Marijuana also is considered a "gateway" to more serious drugs. This proposition is bad medicine."[53]
- The Yuma Sun was against the measure, writing, "Piss no mistake; we support the idea of allowing medical use of marijuana. On that point are legitimate justifications for IT. But perspicuous protections for businesses and private property owners need to be enclosed, and this proposition does not suffice that to our satisfaction."[54]
Polls
- See also: Polls, 2010 balloting measures
- A poll conducted aside Rocky Mountain surveying 555 recorded voters in the state showed that 54 percent supported the measuring rod. The pollard was conducted during October 1-10, 2010 and had a allowance of error of 4.2 share points.[55]
Position is onward and at or over 50% Position is ahead or even, just under 50%
| Particular date of Poll | Pollster | In party favour | Opposed | Undetermined | Number polled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 1-10, 2010 | Range Poll | 54% | 32% | 14% | 555 |
Potential litigation
Reported to reports, there could be possible judicial proceeding. The aspect of the initiative that was under concern was the provision that stated that employers cannot hire, fire and discipline residents who were advised holders of medical marijuana cards. Accordant to Arizona attorney Don Johnsen, state police did not mandate that employers and companies accommodate checkup marijuana patients that were employees, or potential employees of the company. According to Johnsen, "This vote initiative obviously would reverse that." However, in that location could be challenges to this supply if the measure is passed. Johnsen later stated, "Nonpareil Dr. may suppose, 'Yeah, based on these facts, in my professional opinion this mortal was impaired operating room under the influence.' In another case, a Dr. might reach a different determination."
The independent trouble of the provision, according to another Arizona attorney, David Selden, was that a unwavering of handicap on the job imputable cannabis usage would be difficult to find out. Reported to Selden, "Unlike alcohol examination, drug testing doesn't measure the current level of impairment." Selden also stated that basically the most probable way for an employer to blast an employee were to either catch him or her smoke the drug or possessing IT while employed.
Andrew Myers, who was the campaign managing director for the group that spearheaded the initiative, agreed with the assessment that many legal challenges could arise. Myers stated, "Ultimately, we are not able to draft legislating that is sledding to account for whol the situations that are going to come up."[56]
Way to the ballot
-
- Figure also: Arizona signature tune requirements and 2010 ballot measure petition key signature costs
In September 2009, according to group managing director Andrew Myers, the group composed about 125,000 signatures. The postulation drive deadline to submit signatures for 2010 ballot condition was July 1, 2010. The petition drive effort must have collected at least 153,364 signatures since it was a proposed state statute. According to Myers: "This is departure incredibly well and meliorate than I would take in anticipated". In October 2009, Myers reportable that the group had already collected the required signatures and planned to gather some other 100,000 between October and February 2010. Sponsors of the projected maiden submitted their qualifying signatures to election officials in the commonwealth in April and connected June 1, 2010, the Arizona Secretary of State dependant the measure. It was verified at the time that the crusade had collected enough signatures for ballot access. The Arizona Medical Marijuana Policy Project was the main sponsor of the measure.[2] [3]
According to reports, happening April 14, 2010, petition organizers turned in about 250,000 signatures to the Arizona Secretary of State, importantly much the 153,364 mandatory in lodg to ordered on the vote. Saint Andrew Myers, who was the hunting expedition managing director for the Arizona Medical Marijuana Policy Task, explicit, "We are proud to put on these signatures nowadays on behalf of the thousands of patients in Arizona World Health Organization will welfare from this natural law once it is enacted." The Arizona Secretary of State verified that decent signatures were collected on June 1, 2010, sending the measure to the 2010 balloting.[16] [4] [57] [58] [2]
Similar measures
Marijuana-related ballot measures voted on antecedently aside Arizonans include:
- Suggestion 200 in 1996: Allowed doctors to order drugs to seriously and terminally ill patients. The measure's significant provisions were later repealed by the Genus Arizona Legislature.
- Proposition 300 and Proffer 301 in 1998: The repeals by the Legislative assembly were overturned in yet another citizen vote out, but wording of the measure required a holographic prescription, allowing the United States Drug Enforcement Governing body to threaten to revoke prescription drug-writing priveleges of doctors who wrote medical marihuana prescriptions.
- Proposition 203 in 2002: An initiative failed that would ingest allowed a typed recommendation by a doctor sufficient enough to hold medical checkup marijuana.
See also
- Grand Canyon State 2010 voting measures
- Torah governing the initiative process in Arizona
External golf links
- Arizona Medical Marijuana Policy Stick out Official Website
- Arizona Secretary of Say Official Website
- November Ballot Picture Shaping Up To Be Historic in the Struggle To End Marijuana Prohibition
- Learned profession Cannabis sativa suggestion stirs racy debate
Extra reading
Government documents
- Arizona Secretary of State Publicity Pamphlet-Proposition 203
Opposition
- Missive: Prop. 203 is wolf in sheep's habiliment
Other
- World Magazine, "2010 Preview: Ballot initiatives are a way for citizens to settle an issue directly without commonwealth legislatures," January 16, 2010
- Public Organization for the Rectif of Marijuana Laws, "2010 Bequeath Be Symmetrical Better Than 2009 For Ganja Advocates," December 13, 2009 (dead link)
- Greco-Roman deity Marihuana happening Arizona Ballot?
- November Ballot Picture Shaping Adequate to Cost Historic in the Struggle To End Marijuana Inhibition
- Arizona voters to vote happening learned profession marijuana
- Genus Arizona medical-marijuana constabulary in all probability to test workplace regulations
Footnotes
- ↑ CNN.com, "Arizona voters approve medical marijuana evaluate," November 12, 2010
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Arizona Democracy, "Arizona leave vote on medical marijuana," June 2, 2010
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Grand Canyon State Daily Sun, "Prop. 203 sets medical marijuana on right accumulation, financial paths," October 1, 2010
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Arizona Capitol Times, "125,000 have signed Arizona's learned profession pot petition," September 24, 2009
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Arizona Daily Star, "Prop. 203: Foes consumption 'ganja van' scare," October 2, 2010
- ↑ Mental testing Rural area.com, "Puritan Regulations for Checkup Marijuana," December 18, 2010
- ↑ Arizona Republic, "Genus Arizona AG wants to tax medical pot," January 26, 2011
- ↑ Arizona Republic, "Judge to Brewer: Follow voters' will, proceed on pot dispensaries," January 19, 2012
- ↑ Verde News, "AZ lawmakers craft bill to deny medical marijuana to college students," February 2, 2012
- ↑ Phoenix Unprecedented Times, "Greco-Roman deity Marihuana Not a Land Crime on College Campuses, AZ Supreme Court Rules," Crataegus laevigata 23, 2018
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Arizona Foreign minister, "Publicity Pamphlet," accessed September 21, 2010
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 Remark: This text is quoted verbatim from the original reference. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Arizona Secretary of State, "2010 Undiversified Election:Ballot measures"
- ↑ Secretary of State, "Application," May 15, 2009
- ↑ The Raw York Times, "U.S. Won't Prosecute in States That Grant Medical Cannabis," October 19, 2009
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 The Arizona Republic, "Medical-pot rule may bear on Ariz. initiative," Oct 20, 2009
- ↑ Arizona Capital Multiplication, "Former Phoenix police employee takes helm of health chec cannabis maiden," November 30, 2009
- ↑ Kingman Daily Miner, "Sickly Arizonans would profit from medical marijuana," Sept 22, 2010
- ↑ Web log For Arizona, "PCDP Ballot Measure Recommendations," accessed Oct 18, 2010
- ↑ MyFoxPhoenix.com, "Could Medical Marijuana Presently Exist Legal in Arizona?" January 13, 2010 (dead link)
- ↑ Yuma Sunlight, "Marijuana for medical uses canful still impair," March on 21, 2010
- ↑ Pull a fast one on News, "Wal-Marketplace 'Sympathetic' to Man Fired for Exploitation Medical Pot, but Won't Rehire Him," March 17, 2010
- ↑ Yuma Sun, "Marijuana for Greco-Roman deity uses can still impair," March 21, 2010
- ↑ KVOA.com, "Medical marijuana happening November vote," Revered 25, 2010
- ↑ Arizona Daily Star, "Supervisors progress county zoning rules for medical pot," Sep 7, 2010
- ↑ CNBC, "Ariz. Senate to determine whether to tax marijuana," March 25, 2010 (dead link)
- ↑ Arizona Capital Times, "Senat OKs checkup marijuana tax," March 25, 2010
- ↑ Join Unneurotic, "Ariz. Legislature Mulls Medical Marijuana Ballot Opening," March 30, 2010
- ↑ 29.0 29.1 MyFoxPhoenix.com, "Prop 203: Inside information on Push to Legalize Medical Marijuana," July 13, 2010 (exsanguinous link)
- ↑ Easter Arizona Courier, "Medical cannabis activists march in Business district Safford," April 25, 2010
- ↑ 31.0 31.1 ABC15, "Voters vox questions over November ballot measures," Sep 23, 2010 Cite error: Disable
<ref>tag; name "debated" defined quadruplicate times with different content - ↑ Tucson Sentinel, "Supporters: Unwell Arizonans would benefit from medical Cannabis sativa," Sept 20, 2010
- ↑ East Vale Tribune, "Beer maker wants voters to reject medical marijuana proposition," October 21, 2010
- ↑ Tucson Period, "Pot for Pain?" June 24, 2010
- ↑ PRWeb, "Journey Curative Centers Opposes Medical Marijuana Proposition," June 2, 2010
- ↑ The Bugle, "My Turn: PROP 203 negatively impacts schools," October 9, 2010
- ↑ Eastern Valley Tribune, "Voters: Awaken and prepare for heavy-obligation ballot propositions," October 10, 2010
- ↑ Kingman Daily Miner, "Officials sound off on coming propositions," Oct 14, 2010
- ↑ Inwardly Tucson Business, "Pro-business endorsements from Tucson bedroom of commerce," October 22, 2010
- ↑ Stop the Pile, "Home Page"
- ↑ Yuma Sun, "Phoenix political consultant takes objective at medical pot," April 4, 2010
- ↑ Arizona Journal, "Medical Marijuana Question Will Get on November Ballot," June 16, 2010 (dead link)
- ↑ Inner Tucson Business, "Resist temptation, vote out 'no' to decriminalize medical marihuana," September 10, 2010
- ↑ Prescott News, "Consider Prop 203 Carefully Before Voting," September 29, 2010
- ↑ Prescott News, "Learn the Facts about the AZ Medical Marihuana Initiative," July 19, 2010
- ↑ Arizona Secretary of State, "Notifications of Contributions to Ballot Measure Committees"
- ↑ Follow the Money, "Proposition 203," accessed Oct 25, 2010
- ↑ CNBC, "Arizona medical marijuana signups projected at 66K," July 12, 2010 (dead link)
- ↑ Arizona Daily Star, "The Stellar's recommendations on state, local propositions," October 28, 2010
- ↑ Desert Lamp, "The Desert Lamp's Balloting Proposition Endorsements," October 20, 2010
- ↑ Goldwater State, "For decency's sake, vote "yes" on Prop. 203," November 1, 2010
- ↑ Arizona Republic, "Voters should reject push for 'medical' corporation," October 14, 2010
- ↑ East Valley Tribune, "Endorsements: Vote propositions," Oct 24, 2010
- ↑ Yuma Sun, "Marijuana prop has flaw which prevents support," October 14, 2010
- ↑ Arizona Democracy, "Poll: 3 of 10 propositions have support," October 14, 2010
- ↑ Arizona Republic, "Medical-quite a little measure to limit some firings," April 1, 2010
- ↑ Verde Independent, "Medical marijuana law returning to Arizona ballot," March 23, 2010
- ↑ Opposing Views, "Medical Marijuana Expected to Specif for AZ Ballot," April 14, 2010
Marijuana in 2010
- Category:Certified, marijuana, 2010
- Class:Marijuana, Wisconsin, 2010
- Dixie Dakota Medical Marijuana, Initiative 13 (2010)
- California Proffer 19, Marijuana Legalization Initiative (2010)
- California Proposition 20, Congressional Redistricting Initiative (2010)
| 2010 vote measures | ||
|---|---|---|
| I&R States | Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • CA • Colorado • Florida • Idaho • Illinois • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Stop • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Mexico • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • South Dakota • Utah • Washington • Wyoming | |
| Non I&R States | Alabama • Georgia • Hawaii • Indiana • Ioway • Kansas • Louisiana • New Tee shirt • Compass north Carolina • Rhode Island • South Carolina • Tennessee River • Vermont • Virginia | |
| Policy-making topics | (Certified topics only): Abortion • Administration of government • Affirmative action • Enthralled issues • Occupation regulation • Campaign finance • Civil rights • Constitutional conventions • Earthquakes • Education • Elections • Towering domain • Energy • English • Firearms • Gambling • Government activity accountability • Healthcare • Hunting • Direct commonwealth measures • Insurance • Judicial reform • Parturiency • Law enforcement • Marijuana • Natural resources • Property rights • Redistricting • State budgets • Taxes • Term limits • Tobacco • Transportation • Veterans • Irrigate | |
| Other | Scorecard • Petition force deadlines • Polls • Litigation (Lawsuits) • Potential measures • Tuesday Count • Changes in 2010 to laws government balloting measures • Official voter guides • Petition signature costs • 2010 voting bill campaign websites • Certified just abstracted • Media endorsements • Not on the ballot | |
| Post-election | 2010 analyses • 2010 election results • 2010 amendments to constitutions • Campaign contributions | |
 | State of Arizona Phoenix (Das Kapital) |
|---|---|
| Elections | What's along my ballot? | Elections in 2021 | How to vote | How to run office | Vote measures |
| Government | WHO represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | Land executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Common policy |
Where to Renew Medical Marijuana Card? Prescott Valley
Source: https://ballotpedia.org/Arizona_Medical_Marijuana_Question,_Proposition_203_%282010%29
0 Response to "Where to Renew Medical Marijuana Card? Prescott Valley"
Post a Comment